The Red-Green-Blue Axis: Unholy Alliance or Emerging Geopolitical Reality? By Brian Simpson and Chris Knight (Florida)

In an age of disinformation, global chaos, and institutional decay, there is one idea that many in the political mainstream refuse to take seriously: the emergence of a "Red-Green-Blue" axis, an informal but increasingly visible convergence of three seemingly disparate forces: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Islamist movements, and globalist institutions. While dismissed by polite society as a conspiracy theory, this triadic alignment is not just speculative fiction. It is a working hypothesis that, when examined without ideological blinders, explains a great deal about the current global disorder.

To be clear, the Red-Green-Blue axis is not a formal alliance signed in blood or ink. It is a convergence of interests, tactics, and narratives among powerful actors who, though ideologically distinct, are united by one overriding goal: the destabilisation of the liberal-democratic West.

1. Red: The CCP's Strategic Subversion

China's ruling Communist Party may no longer be Marxist in the classical sense, but it remains ideologically committed to authoritarian centralism and global dominance. Its fusion of Leninist control with capitalist mechanisms has created a hybrid model that threatens liberal democracies more effectively than Soviet communism ever could. Through the Belt and Road Initiative, debt diplomacy, cyber espionage, and control over rare earths and critical infrastructure, the CCP has embedded itself deep into Western systems.

But the subversion goes beyond economics. Chinese state media now shape narratives globally, exploiting "woke" discourse in the West while repressing dissent at home. In Confucian disguise, the Red Dragon funds Confucius Institutes across Western universities, subtly shaping academic and cultural discourse. Beijing benefits directly from Western cultural and institutional fragmentation, a fragmentation it is happy to exacerbate, even if that means backing Islamist or progressive destabilisers in proxy.

2. Green: Islamism as Cultural Shock Troop

While Islam as a faith spans billions of peaceful believers, Islamism is a political doctrine aimed at reshaping secular societies in accordance with sharia law. This ideology, espoused by groups from the Muslim Brotherhood to Iran's theocracy to Turkey's neo-Ottoman ambitions, is not only anti-Western, but actively parasitic on Western tolerance.

How does this tie into the axis? China's brutal suppression of its Uyghur Muslim population should theoretically make it a pariah to Islamist movements. Yet, with rare exception, major Muslim nations and Islamist groups are silent, even defensive of China. Why? Because anti-Westernism overrides theological consistency. The shared enemy, America, Israel, liberalism, secularism, makes strange bedfellows, and the silence on the Uyghur genocide is the dog that didn't bark.

Meanwhile, in the West, progressive Leftist elites (blue) ally with Islamist organisations to push "inclusion" agendas that routinely erode Western cultural norms. Radical Islamic clerics speak at UN panels on human rights, while European cities bend to imported blasphemy taboos under the guise of "diversity." The green element exploits democratic openness to wage asymmetric ideological war from within.

3. Blue: The Globalist Trojan Horse

The "blue" in this alliance refers not to Democrats or centrists, but to the amorphous elite class, the technocrats, NGOs, multinational corporations, and supranational institutions, who believe that national sovereignty is obsolete and that governance should be global, technocratic, and post-political. Think Klaus Schwab, George Soros, the WEF, and the soft-authoritarian bureaucracies of the EU and UN.

These elites are not coordinating by teleconference with Beijing and Tehran, but they don't need to. Their policies and ideologies functionally align: a distrust of nation-states, a preference for managed democracy, and a hostility toward traditional Western values (family, religion, borders, speech). They outsource production to the CCP, push ESG frameworks that empower authoritarian states, and promote mass immigration from Islamist regions under the banner of "inclusion" and "equity."

In doing so, they create precisely the conditions in which Red and Green forces flourish. Western democracies become more fragile, more censored, more surveilled, and more economically dependent, all in the name of global progress.

4. Convergence by Design or Convenience?

Critics rightly note that the Red, Green, and Blue actors differ in fundamental ways. The CCP represses Muslims, Islamists oppose atheism, and globalists are secular technocrats. But ideological purity is no barrier to strategic cooperation. History is littered with such temporary alliances: the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the US-Saudi marriage of convenience, or Mao's opening to Nixon.

Today, the CCP funds Western environmental NGOs to hamper Western energy independence while building coal plants at home. Islamists exploit human rights discourse to protect illiberal doctrines. Globalist institutions bankroll "social justice" movements that undermine social cohesion, while turning a blind eye to Chinese or Islamic human rights abuses.

These aren't random coincidences. They are signs of systemic convergence. The West is being softened, economically, culturally, morally, by three coordinated pressures:

Red: Top-down geopolitical coercion and infrastructure capture.

Green: Cultural disruption and ideological absolutism.

Blue: Internal self-sabotage disguised as humanitarianism and progress.

5. The Real-World Effects

UN paralysis: Western democracies are constantly outvoted at the UN Human Rights Council by a bloc of Red-Green-Blue actors pushing resolutions against Israel while ignoring North Korea or Syria.

Academic capture: Western universities, awash in CCP funding and postcolonial ideology, increasingly police dissent and embrace authoritarian speech codes.

Corporate cowardice: Multinationals routinely censor Western speech (e.g., criticism of China, of Islam, or of trans ideology) while expanding in markets that lack basic freedoms.

These aren't isolated phenomena. They're symptoms of a deeper alignment.

It's Not a Conspiracy. It's an Operating System.

The Red-Green-Blue axis is not a fantasy stitched together by paranoiacs. It's a functional reality, not centrally coordinated, but structurally coherent. Each node of the axis pursues its own goals, but their convergence creates a self-reinforcing system of anti-Western destabilisation. Dismissing this framework as a conspiracy is not only intellectually lazy, but politically dangerous.

If the West is to survive as a coherent civilisation, it must first name the forces aligned against it. Only then can it begin the long work of renewal, by disentangling itself from supply chain dependency (Red), restoring civilisational confidence (Green), and resisting the dehumanising drift of technocratic governance (Blue).

Because while the Red-Green-Blue alliance may be temporary, its effects could be permanent. Extinction of the West and White people.

https://libertysentinel.org/world-war-xi-china-partnering-with-islamists-to-destroy-us/