The Japanese Covid Vax Data Revelation: A Case for Vaccine Scepticism, By Brian Simpson
In a world where censorship and misinformation have often clouded the discourse around Covid-19 vaccines, a newly released Japanese database tracking 18 million vaccinated citizens has emerged as a bombshell, reigniting debates about the safety and efficacy of these injections. The data, which reveals a disturbing pattern of increased mortality rates among the vaccinated, particularly in the months following their shots, provides compelling evidence for vaccine scepticism. This blog post explores the key findings from this dataset, the credibility of the researchers involved, and the implications for public health policy and trust in medical authorities.
On June 15, 2025, a group of Japanese truth-seekers, led by journalist Masako Ganaha and including Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi and Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, released a broadcast that exposed vaccine data from over 18 million people. This dataset, previously suppressed by the Japanese government, revealed a horrifying trend: the more Covid-19 vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they were likely to die. The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike in mortality just 90 to 120 days after the final shot, a pattern that was absent among the unvaccinated.
Dr. Murakami, a respected professor at the Tokyo University of Science and vice director at the Research Center for RNA Science, with over 100 published studies and a Doctor of Pharmaceutical Science from the University of Tokyo, provided a stark analysis. He warned, "The more doses you get, the sooner you're likely to die, within a shorter period." His conclusion was based on clear graphical evidence: those who received three shots died sooner than those who took two, and those who took two died sooner than those who took one. The peak mortality window, consistently between 90 and 120 days post-injection, aligned with global reports of sudden deaths among the vaccinated, from young athletes collapsing on the field to professionals dying unexpectedly.
The credibility of this data is underscored by Dr. Murakami's extensive scientific background and the rigorous nature of the analysis. The dataset compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, showing no noticeable spike in mortality among the unvaccinated, thus debunking claims that Covid-19 itself was the primary killer. This contrast is crucial, as it isolates the vaccine as the likely cause of the observed deaths. Dr. Murakami's assertion that "if the vaccine had no toxicity or didn't induce death, there wouldn't be a peak" is a damning indictment of the injections' safety profile.
The data's release is particularly significant given the historical precedent of vaccine safety concerns. The 1976 swine flu vaccine was withdrawn after just 53 deaths and around 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, despite only a quarter of Americans being vaccinated. In contrast, the Covid-19 vaccines have been associated with millions of deaths and injuries worldwide, yet no country has halted their use. This discrepancy highlights the unprecedented negligence in allowing these shots to remain on the market, despite mounting evidence of harm.
The suppression of this data by governments and the dismissal of dissenting voices by corporate media represent a profound betrayal of public trust. Governments and pharmaceutical giants assured the world that these vaccines were "safe and effective," silencing doctors, censoring research, and smearing sceptics as conspiracy theorists. Yet, the Japanese data, now in the public domain, confirms what many dissenting scientists, like Dr. Peter McCullough, have warned: "It's unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It's absolutely unacceptable."
The implications of this betrayal are far-reaching. The vaccinated now face uncertain futures, plagued by toxic spike proteins, autoimmune disorders, and heart damage, while the unvaccinated, who resisted one of the most aggressive propaganda campaigns in history, remain healthier and freer. This stark contrast vindicates the unvaccinated and raises questions about the true motives behind the vaccine rollout. Was it about health, or was it part of something more sinister, as some suggest, a depopulation agenda hiding in plain sight? I think the later.
The Japanese data provides a robust case for vaccine scepticism. It challenges the narrative that Covid-19 vaccines are unequivocally safe and effective, offering empirical evidence that contradicts official claims. For those who have questioned the vaccines from the beginning, this data is a validation of their concerns. It also serves as a wake-up call for the broader public, urging a re-evaluation of the risks and benefits of these injections.
Vaccine scepticism, often maligned as anti-science, is now supported by scientific data from a credible source. Dr. Murakami's analysis, grounded in pharmaceutical science and statistical evidence, cannot be easily dismissed. It demands a serious reconsideration of public health policies that have prioritised vaccination over other preventive measures and ignored adverse outcomes. The data also highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in medical research, areas where governments and corporations have failed miserably.
The release of this data is a triumph over censorship, a reminder of the power of independent journalism and scientific inquiry. Masako Ganaha's efforts to bypass government stonewalling exemplify the resilience of those committed to truth. However, it also underscores the extent to which dissenting voices have been marginalised. The corporate media's role in dismissing these findings as conspiracy theories is a testament to the entrenched interests that benefit from maintaining the status quo.
This censorship has real-world consequences. It has delayed the recognition of vaccine harms, leaving millions vulnerable to adverse effects. It has also eroded trust in public health institutions, a trust that may take years to rebuild. The Japanese data, by breaking through these walls of deception, offers a chance to restore that trust, but only if it is met with honest engagement rather than denial.
The Japanese data on Covid-19 vaccination outcomes is thus a game-changer for vaccine scepticism. It provides empirical evidence that the more doses a person receives, the sooner they are likely to die, a finding that cannot be ignored. The credibility of researchers like Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, combined with the stark contrast between vaccinated and unvaccinated mortality rates, supports a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety. This data is not just a scientific revelation but a moral imperative, urging us to question the policies that have led to this point and to demand transparency and accountability from those in power.
As the world grapples with the consequences of the vaccine rollout, the Japanese findings serve as a beacon for those who have been sceptical all along. They remind us that science is not about consensus but about evidence, and that evidence, when finally uncovered, can change everything. The question now is whether the world will listen before it's too late.
"The truth is finally breaking through the walls of censorship and deception. A newly released Japanese database tracking 18 million vaccinated citizens has exposed a horrifying pattern: the more COVID-19 shots a person receives, the sooner they are likely to die. The data, suppressed by governments and dismissed by corporate media, reveals a sharp spike in deaths just 90 to 120 days after vaccination—a trend that cannot be ignored. As the world grapples with skyrocketing excess mortality, heart failure in young athletes, and sudden deaths among the vaccinated, this bombshell report confirms what dissenting scientists warned from the beginning: these experimental injections were never safe. They were never about health. And now, the evidence suggests they may have been part of something far more sinister.
Key points:
A Japanese database tracking 18 million vaccinated individuals reveals a deadly spike in mortality 3 to 4 months after vaccination.
Respected Tokyo University professor Dr. Yasufumi Murakami warns: "The more doses you get, the sooner you're likely to die."
Deaths peak earlier with each additional dose, suggesting cumulative toxicity from repeated mRNA injections.
Unlike the vaccinated, unvaccinated populations show no such spike in mortality—debunking claims that COVID-19 itself is the primary killer.
Historical precedent, like the 1976 swine flu vaccine withdrawal after just 53 deaths, highlights the unprecedented negligence in allowing these shots to remain on the market.
The data they didn't want you to see
When journalist Masako Ganaha and a team of Japanese researchers bypassed government stonewalling to release this explosive dataset, the implications were undeniable. The numbers don't lie. Graph after graph showed the same terrifying trend: vaccinated individuals were dying at alarming rates within months of their last shot, while the unvaccinated saw no such spike. Dr. Murakami, a pharmaceutical scientist with over 100 published studies, minced no words: "If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn't induce death, there wouldn't be a peak. That's the point."
The most damning evidence came from a chart tracking deaths by dose count. Those who received three shots died sooner than those who took two, and those who took two died sooner than those who took one. The peak mortality window—90 to 120 days post-injection—aligned eerily with reports of sudden deaths worldwide, from healthy athletes collapsing on the field to young professionals dying in their sleep.
A betrayal of public trust
Governments and pharmaceutical giants assured the world these shots were "safe and effective." They silenced dissent, censored doctors, and smeared skeptics as conspiracy theorists. Yet here, in cold, hard data, is proof that they knew—or should have known—the truth. The 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after just 25 deaths. Today, with millions dead or injured, not a single country has halted COVID-19 vaccinations.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a leading cardiologist and early critic of the vaccine rollout, put it bluntly: "It's unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It's absolutely unacceptable." Yet this is exactly what has happened—on a scale that dwarfs every medical scandal in modern history.
The unvaccinated were right all along
While the vaccinated now face uncertain futures—plagued by toxic spike proteins, autoimmune disorders, and heart damage—the unvaccinated stand vindicated. They resisted one of the most aggressive propaganda campaigns in history, enduring job losses, social ostracization, and even forced segregation. Now, as excess deaths soar among the jabbed, the unvaccinated remain healthier, freer, and alive - their souls intact.
This isn't just about science. It's about criminal negligence, corporate greed, and a depopulation agenda hiding in plain sight. The Japanese data is a wake-up call. The question is: will the world listen before it's too late?
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/japan-releases-bombshell-vax-vs-unvax
"A COVID vaccine database covering 18 million citizens has just been released for the first time.
After reviewing the data, a top professor warned: "The more doses you get, the sooner you're likely to die."
The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike just 3 to 4 months after the final shot.
Let's break down the data.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
On June 15th, a group of brave Japanese truth seekers did what their government wouldn't—they released a bombshell broadcast exposing vaccine data from over 18 million people.
Journalist Masako Ganaha posted on X: "If the government won't do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people! Database of 18 million vaccinated people revealed for the first time!"
The video featured Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, and the Information Disclosure Request Team.
Dr. Yasufumi Murakami isn't just some fringe voice. He's a respected professor at the Tokyo University of Science, where he serves as vice director at the Research Center for RNA Science.
He holds a Doctor of Pharmaceutical Science from the University of Tokyo and has authored over 100 scientific publications.
But when the data went public, things got deeply unsettling.
Dr. Murakami's conclusion was blunt: "…the more doses you get, the sooner you're likely to die, within a shorter period…"
The first graph compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged—especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot.
"A significant peak forms at three or four months," he said, pointing to the vaccine as the likely cause. "It's probably due to the vaccine's influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death."
Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore. It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot.
The title translates to: "Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths."
The note on the right reads: "As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner."
Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death. In other words, those counted under the third dose curve had received three shots and died before receiving a fourth.
What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days.
The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection.
As Dr. Murakami noted, "We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you're likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses."
He added, "If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn't induce death, there wouldn't be a peak. That's the point."
"This is a key discovery," he continued. "The more doses, the more the peak shifts, indicating that the toxicity accumulates. The toxicity overlaps, and the more doses you receive, the faster people die."
While the data is truly alarming, it comes as no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention. There's simply no excuse for these shots to still be on the market.
Remember, the swine flu vaccine was pulled in 1976 after just 25 deaths and around 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome—and that was with only a quarter of Americans vaccinated.
Ultimately, 53 deaths were linked to the program, and the government not only shut it down but also issued apologies and compensation to victims."
Comments