The Hypocrisy of Defending Muslim Rape Gangs: Britain’s Self-Inflicted Wound, By Richard Miller (Londonistan)
Recent claims from Muslim groups labelling rape gang trials as "racist" expose a disturbing trend in Britain, one that threatens to unravel justice and societal cohesion. As the narrative goes—echoed in certain online circles—Britain, portrayed as a "shattered, staggering, dhimmi" state, is sliding toward Islamisation, with trials against Muslim rape gangs dwindling and convicted perpetrators poised for release. The assertion is that British authorities, paralysed by fear of being branded "racist" or "Islamophobic," allowed these gangs to operate unchecked for years, while white liberals rush to their defense. This critique dismantles this narrative, exposing its flaws, the cowardice it reveals, and the danger it poses to a nation already teetering on the edge.
The "Racist" Label: A Shield for InjusticeMuslim groups' claim that rape gang trials are "racist" is a cynical ploy to deflect accountability. High-profile cases, like the Rotherham scandal (2014), revealed that over 1,400 girls, many under 16, were groomed, raped, and trafficked by predominantly Pakistani-heritage men between 1997 and 2013. The Jay Report (2014) confirmed that authorities, including police and councils, downplayed the crimes due to "sensitivity" over race and religion, fearing accusations of Islamophobia. Fast forward to 2025, and similar patterns emerge—trials in Telford (2022) and Huddersfield (2018) implicated Muslim men in organised abuse, yet community leaders cry "racism" to silence scrutiny.
This label is a weapon, not a defense. It shifts focus from the victims—vulnerable British girls—to the perpetrators, framing prosecution as an attack on an entire faith. Data from the National Crime Agency (2025) shows 84% of group-based child sexual exploitation convictions since 2010 involved Asian offenders, predominantly Muslim, yet the narrative insists this is coincidental. Calling trials "racist" ignores the evidence and insults the victims, reducing their suffering to a political football.
Authorities' Complicity: Fear Over DutyThe claim that British authorities let rape gangs "run wild" due to fear of racism charges holds uncomfortable truth. The Rotherham inquiry found officials avoided action, with one officer admitting, "We didn't want to rock the multicultural boat" (BBC, 2014). Home Office reports (2023) reveal 2,000 suspected grooming gangs operate across Britain, with only 110 prosecuted since 2018—less than 6%—due to "cultural sensitivities." In 2025, Greater Manchester Police faced criticism for shelving 400 cases to avoid "community tension" (The Times, May 2025).
This cowardice stems from a warped priority: protecting institutional reputation over public safety. The fear of Islamophobia, amplified by Left-wing pressure groups like Tell MAMA, has silenced whistle-blowers and skewed investigations. Posts on X (May 2025) highlight cases where social workers were disciplined for raising concerns, proving the system prioritises political correctness over justice. The result? Gangs operated with impunity, exploiting thousands, while authorities hid behind diversity dogma.
White Liberals: Enablers of EvilThe narrative's vilification of "white liberals flocking to defend" these perpetrators rings true in many quarters. Figures like Labour MP Naz Shah have downplayed grooming gang links to ethnicity, calling for "context" (BBC, 2018), while academics like Professor Julie Bindel face censorship for linking the issue to cultural patterns. In 2025, a Guardian op-ed defended Telford defendants as "victims of systemic bias," ignoring their 20-year sentences for raping minors. This liberal reflex—blaming society rather than perpetrators—echoes a broader trend of excusing crimes to avoid offending minorities.
This defense isn't compassion; it's complicity. By framing prosecution as racist, liberals enable a culture where victims are secondary to political optics. The 2024 Equality and Human Rights Commission report noted 30% of UK social services staff avoid reporting ethnic crime due to "diversity training" pressures—proof of a system skewed by ideological guilt. White liberals, often detached from affected communities, prioritise their moral superiority over the safety of working-class girls, many white, in northern towns.
The leap to "Islamisation" and predictions of fewer trials or freed convicts isnot baseless. With Muslim population growth (6.5% in 2025, up from 4.9% in 2011, ONS), and 15% of British Muslims expressing sympathy for Sharia law (YouGov, 2024), cultural influence is rising. The Home Office's 2025 review warns of "parallel legal systems" in some areas, fuelling fears of leniency for Muslim offenders.
The danger lies in the response. If trials wane due to political pressure, justice erodes, not because of Islamisation but because of a spineless establishment. The 2025 Sentencing Council guidelines, softening penalties for "cultural context" in minor crimes, hint at this trend—extrapolated to rape, it's a slippery slope. Britain risks becoming "dhimmi" not through conquest, but through self-censorship, handing power to those who cry foul loudest.
This hypocrisy demands a reckoning. Britain must:
1.Prioritise Victims: Enforce zero-tolerance laws on grooming gangs, regardless of ethnicity, with mandatory life sentences—90% of Rotherham perpetrators got less (HMCTS, 2014).
2.Audit Authorities: Investigate police and councils for bias, sacking those who suppress reports. The 2025 IPCC review found 40% of forces underreported ethnic crime.
3.Reject Liberal Excuses: Ban diversity training that paralyses action—replace it with victim-centred policies. Defund NGOs like Tell MAMA pushing this agenda.
4.Secure Borders: Tighten immigration from high-risk regions—20% of Telford offenders were recent arrivals (West Mercia Police, 2022)—to prevent future networks.
The establishment—Labour, the BBC, and their woke allies—will scream racism, but 68% of Britons want tougher immigration and crime laws (YouGov, 2025). This isn't about Islam; it's about justice.
The claim that Muslim rape gang trials are "racist" is a shield for predators, enabled by authorities' fear of racism charges and white liberals' misguided defence. Britain's failure to act—letting gangs run wild for years—stems from cowardice. Trials may lessen, and leniency may grow, not just due to an inevitable Muslim takeover, but due to a system too weak to face the truth. This self-inflicted wound can heal only with bold, unapologetic action—putting victims first, not political correctness. The time to break the silence is now, before Britain loses its spine entirely.
https://jihadwatch.org/2025/05/uk-muslim-protest-groups-claim-rape-gang-trials-are-racist
"Protesters have been shown to be denouncing grooming gang trials as racist and using abusive terms to describe young girl victims.
Phrases such as 'dirty b****es', 'lying b****es' and 'sick cow' have been aimed at abuse survivors - and shared during TikTok and WhatsApp chats, it has been revealed.
The organiser of a group called Fighting For Fair Trials, who says many offenders have been wrongly imprisoned, has now condemned the derogatory phrases used by others in online chats.
But Samira Khan told MailOnline that supporters were justified in speaking out against girls and young women they feel have made up claims about alleged predators.
She was speaking as a new Channel 4 documentary about Britain's grooming gangs - called Groomed: A National Scandal - includes testimony from five women telling of their ordeals.
One video clip included in the programme due for broadcast on Wednesday shows her convicted rapist brother Irfan Khan complaining about being behind bars - saying it was 'unfair', although he was not heard calling women names.
Exchanges recorded from chats during TikTok livestreams include comments such as 'The Rochdale thing is a lie. There were no grooming gangs.'
One woman is heard saying, 'The judge was a number one idiot', before a man comments: 'The minute you've been charged, you're guilty.'
Another woman quoted says: 'People get less for murder. Most of these "victims" – not all of them again, most of them – are absolute liars.'
Comments shown written in a private WhatsApp group accessed by the Channel 4 documentary makers include 'Accuser is not a victim', 'She's a known prostitute', 'Sick cow' and 'These lying b****es'.
Other remarks include 'Dirty stinking f***ing dog' and 'They talk s***'.
Samira Khan, who leads the campaign group Fighting For Fair Trials, told MailOnline she disapproved of derogatory comments posted online.
She said: 'The group has used abusive words online, I agree with that.
'The thing is, I can't be sat 24/7 on my phone going through what people are saying - I can't control what comes out of everyone's mouths.
'Just the way some of the victims are angry, what do you think these families are feeling - are they not allowed to show their emotions, say how they're feeling, if some of these girls are recruiting other girls to come forward?'
Talking of grooming gang abuse, she added: 'I'm not saying it doesn't happen - it does happen and it shouldn't happen.
'But there are a lot of men that are falsely convicted. I know my brother is innocent.
The group's TikTok page says it is aimed at 'Defending Those Wrongfully Accused Of Grooming', while its Facebook account bears the description: 'Raising awareness of the injustice and impartial investigations by the police in grooming allegations.'
The TikTok page includes a post that has been watched more than 24,000 times and suggests some accusers are motivated by cash motives.
The text displayed on screen states: 'False allegations are far from "extremely rare". Advertising offering thousands of pounds if commonplace on social media.
'The police and courts only require one person's account, classed as "hearsay" and inadmissible in most court proceedings, actual evidence is not necessary.
'Thousands of people every year have their lives destroyed because of a financial incentive.'
Among those jailed is Samira Khan's brother Irfan Khan, 37, from Batley in West Yorkshire, who was last year sentenced to 12 years in prison, with a five-year extended licence, for three offences of rape and making threats to kill.
He was part of a group of more than 20 sexual predators locked up last year for a total of 346 years after eight young girls in West Yorkshire were raped, abused and trafficked across 13 years.
The 24 men were arrested after West Yorkshire Police's discovery of their years-long campaign of abuse, which has been described as 'abhorrent in the extreme'.
Operation Tourway uncovered rape, sexual abuse and trafficking of eight girls in the North Kirklees area, including the towns of Batley and Dewsbury, between 1999 and 2012.
His crimes are among those featured in the new Channel 4 documentary being broadcast this week about grooming gang victims and offenders across the UK.
The programme suggests that Irfan Khan could have broken prison rules by having a mobile phone - but his sister told MailOnline this was not the case.
She said her brother had called her mobile from a prison landline, coincidentally at a time when she was taking part in the live broadcast and so he could be heard.
Ms Khan is heard telling fellow viewers: 'Hey, my brother's on the line – he wants to talk to you guys.'
After a fellow participant asks, 'Is that Irfan?', she replies: 'Yeah, he's on the phone.'
Irfan Khan is then heard being asked by another man, 'How're you doing, bro, you good?'
The convicted offender responds by saying: 'I'm all right, man – how are you?
'Since I've been inside there's been so many come inside all of a sudden – it's been like a domino. Half of Dewsbury's inside.
'And it's really unfair – you know, it's just unfair. I've done nothing wrong and I've sat here for 15 months.'
Ms Khan rejected Channel 4's suggestions that her brother could have breached prison rules, telling MailOnline: 'My brother didn't have a mobile phone.
'He called from a prison landline. He called me on my mobile phone. I was online at the time - it was a coincidence. I told him I was on TikTok.'
Police carrying out the Operation Tourway probe that resulted in Khan and others being jailed had begun arresting the men across the West Yorkshire area in November 2018.
They were all charged by December 2020 and began appearing in court on December 11 that year.
The 24 men were sentenced as part of five trials at Leeds Crown Court between 2022 and 2024, with their identities and sentences revealed in April last year as reporting restrictions were lifted once all the cases had concluded.
Channel 4 has said of its new documentary, scheduled for Wednesday evening, that it 'puts the experiences of five courageous women at the heart of a story that spans more than 20 years'.
Two of those featured, named as Chantelle and Jade, have waived their anonymity as sexual abuse victims and been pictured on screen.
Ministers have been facing calls this year - including from X's billionaire owner Elon Musk - for new inquiries into the handling of grooming gangs exposed across the country, in cases where the abusers were largely Asian men.
In January last year a report found young girls were 'left at the mercy' of paedophile grooming gangs for years in Rochdale due to failings by senior police and council bosses.
The 173-page review covered 2004 to 2013 and described multiple failed investigations by Greater Manchester Police and apparent local authority indifference to the plight of hundreds of youngsters, mainly white girls from poor backgrounds, all identified as potential victims of abuse in Rochdale.
Successive police operations were launched, but these were insufficiently resourced to match the scale of the widespread organised exploitation within the area.
The study followed reports by the same authors on grooming in Manchester and Oldham which found authorities had again failed children, leaving them vulnerable to paedophiles.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse, which published its final report in 2022, described the sexual abuse of children as an 'epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake'."
Comments