Do We Really Need to Import Sex Offenders? The British Public Deserves an Answer, By Richard Miller (Londonistan)
The Orwellian Ministry of Justice has finally done what UK critics have demanded for years: released hard data on the number of foreign nationals in British prisons. The results are as disturbing as they are unsurprising.
More than 1,700 foreign nationals are currently imprisoned for sex crimes in England and Wales. That's a 9.9% increase in just one year, more than double the increase for native Britons. The number of foreign violent offenders is also at an all-time high. Foreign nationals now make up more than 10% of inmates convicted of sexual assault or violence, despite being a much smaller proportion of the general population.
These figures raise a fundamental question: Why is Britain importing violent and sexually dangerous men at all? Isn't the UK tragically well-supplied with its own homegrown offenders without adding more from abroad?
Every politician who shrugs this off is essentially saying: "We know there's a risk of rape, assault, and trafficking, but we'll take it." They're gambling with British women's safety. It's the kind of cost-benefit analysis only elites safely insulated from the consequences can afford to make.
We've heard for years that immigration is a "net positive." But even if that were true in the most abstract economic sense, which it is not, what's the net moral value of a raped girl in Epping? What's the cost of knowing that 40% of people charged with sexual offences in London are foreign nationals?
Albanians currently top the list of foreign prisoners, mostly for drug offences. But the fastest-growing nationalities in prison are from war-torn or unstable regions: Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran. Are we really doing serious criminal background checks on people fleeing failed states? Or are we just waving them through in the name of compassion and hoping they behave?
Britain's prison system is already bursting. Half of its jails are officially rated as "concerning" or "seriously concerning." Staff assaults are at a record high. Drone drops of contraband have surged. Into this crumbling system we've added 6,673 foreign inmates at a cost of £360 million a year. That's £360 million taken from British taxpayers to house rapists, thugs, and dealers who never should've been here in the first place.
Meanwhile, the Home Office stammers about deportation, claiming over 5,000 were removed last year, but that still leaves thousands behind bars. Many of their countries of origin refuse to take them back. And Britain? Too polite to insist.
The solution isn't complicated.
No visa without a verifiable clean criminal record.
Deportation for all foreign offenders, regardless of sentence length.
Red-list countries that refuse to repatriate criminals, with tradesanctions.
Suspend aid until they cooperate.
If this sounds harsh, remember: every imported sex offender is a policy failure with a human victim.
Immigration policy should serve one goal above all: the safety and well-being of British citizens. Not utopian ideals, not virtue signalling, and certainly not the convenience of politicians terrified of being called racist.
It's time to stop pretending that Britain is obliged to be the world's halfway house. Compassion for victims should outrank compassion for criminals.
The British public didn't vote for this. They were never asked. But they're the ones paying the price, in pounds, in fear, and sometimes in blood.
Comments