With the anniversary of the 9/11 event coming up, it is timely to reflect upon the entire event. Who did it and why? We are to believe that a group of jihadist terrorists hijacked jets, and flew them into the Twin Towers in a suicide mission. The jet fuel caused the steel structure to pancake down, just as if an implosion demolition occurred.

But, even if this narrative is accepted for the sake of argument, it leaves  World Trade Center Building 7. As Tucker Carlson has noted, it also collapsed, exactly as if a demolition implosion occurred, but this time, there was no impact by a plane at all. The standard story is that burning debris from the other buildings caused fires that led to structural collapse, something not seen before. But, this is open to challenge, as detailed below

Most people in the West are not conscious of the dangers of nuclear war with Russia. Recently Tucker Carlson in an interview predicted that the US regime would be engaging in a hot kinetic war with Russia within the next year, probably as yet another measure to ensure continuity of power in the 2024 elections, and disposal of Donald Trump, if election fraud and lawfare do not do the job.

John Tierney has published a great article at the City-Journal debunking the ideology that modern society is riddled with misogyny. That idea is seen most clearly in feminists like former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard, who without jest, has argued that women are discriminated against, even though she reached the top position. Her book, Not Now, Not Ever (20220 is an example. But there is no evidence that women are being systematically discriminated against in employment as Tierney shows, and in professions such as academia, especially in the Arts/social sciences, women have come to dominate the professions, if they can be called that. In fact, discrimination against young men in the education sectors and a range of other professions is occurring as women rise in leadership roles, and in fact discriminate against men.

A major study has appeared in the leading journal, Climate, which has radical consequences for the mainstream climate crisis narrative. This narrative, as has been document in many posts at the blog, is responsible for the elites pushing for bans upon farming practices, the eating of red meat, and the use of fossil fuels. The idea that human-caused climate change is occurring is based upon climatic data, but how good is that data? And, if that data is shown to be inadequate, then the climate change crisis narrative is immediately challenged. So, the science is highly relevant.

The Prime Minister in defending the Voice has addressed the issue of the Uluru Statement from the Heart. In parliament he has said that the document is on A4 page long, and he held up a piece of paper. Then the prime minister responded to the claim that the actual document is 26 pages long, by comparing such claims to various absurd conspiracy theories, such as the fake moon landing.

When pressed for details about how the Voice will operate, the Prime Minister has said to go have a look at the Calma-Langton report. Well, the Institute of Public Affairs has done just that and produced a critical response, Undemocratic, Unfair, Complex and Divisive: An Analysis of the Calma-Langton Report (June 2023). This model has a group of elites of the V who are not democratically elected, but who will be influencing every aspect of Australian social and political life. But, the Voice elites will not be accountable to anyone; however, the Voice will legally enforce consultations if governments dare not to consult (i.e. accept) their dictates.

Stephen Chavura, in a tweet reposted by Malcolm Roberts, makes the point that the Voice to parliaments, is not simply that. There will be a Voice to the entire public service, which will involve everything they do, and in addition there will be 35 regional voices, interacting with all aspects of state and local government. The Voice is then a vast structure which will essentially be a replacement government, for as the Prime Minster has said, even though the Voice has no veto power, it would be a brave government to defy the voice. If the YES side succeeds, then democracy ends in Australia, to be replaced by the rule of Woke. As well, economic decline will be rapid as the Voice drains away the life blood of the country.

Malcolm Roberts draws our attention to explicit statements by a leading Voice proponent:

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, was elected for being a hard-liner on immigration, the “turn back the boats,” type. But this year over 100,00 illegals have arrived in Italy, and conservatives and those from the Right who formerly supported her, have become somewhat sour with her, and rightly so. She has failed to put into place measures that she promised, to block boat landings, and establish offshore reception centres to evaluate asylum applications. These measures could easily have been put into place, so the logical inference to make is that the globalists have got to her and neutralised her, just as was done to Donald Trump during his presidency. Trump could easily have secured the US border, but did not move.

This is an illustration of the sheer power that the globalist elite wield, and the difficulty we face, but not impossibility, in defeating them. We must fight even harder.

Covid king Dr Fauci has made a return to the Covid mandate circuit, appearing in an interview with CNN, expressing his sympathies for a return of the mask mandates. However, this time on a conventional media outlet, he got hammered by material showing that masks are useless in stopping transmission, as extracted below.

Flustered, the technocrat pushed the line that this may be true on a social level, but not an individual level. Of course, this is a logically absurd position, as the social is just made up of those individual instances. Anyway, good to see that this time round, there is a bit more opposition, even from mainstream sources, to the Covid mandate tyranny.

Jeremy Bell, Lecturer in History, Philosophy, and Literature at Campion College, has a fascinating piece on J. J. R. Tolkien and philosophical anarchism, the view that, not that beared men should throw bombs, but that the state is largely in part or whole unjustified, and many state institutions tend to tyranny. In a letter of 29 November 1943 to his 18-year-old son Christopher, he said: “My political opinions lean more and more towards Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) — or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy.” The latter position seems to be very much a “return of the king,” idea, which seems dangerous in these centralisation times, but as argued by Bell, Tolkien has large sympathies for the idea that people are best off working out relationships and institutions beyond the nation state. Bell goes into great detail discussing and rebutting some of the obvious objections to this position of moving beyond the state. Most importantly since Covid, especially in the United states, we have seen how a state can declare war upon a significant segment of the population which is opposed to the Biden regime.

Probably the longer-term future of humanity will involve states breaking down and collapsing, so the anarchist position may come to be adopted by default. Tolkien may well be proven to be correct after all.

James Roguski has written a People’s Declaration, which opposes, in essence, the New World Order that the elites are creating. It covers all the bases in a simple and concise way. It is not a petition, but is something for individuals to either modify in their own words, or circulate as if. It is a personal statement of resistance that can be put on social media, and publications, or just handed to friends.

Here is an incredible story from New Zealand, covered in America, of a woman who had a surgical tool, the size of a dinner plate left inside her after the delivery of her baby by C-section. It took sometime for the medicos to figure this out, and after a time, negligence was found by an investigating board. But, the moral here is that if mistakes can be made with something as simple as doing a surgical tools count, how much more easily can mistakes be made with drugs, and, perish the thought, vaccines?

A few months back, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) published a report, which noted the herd of elephants in the room, that most of the main stream press denies, or if mentions, tries to cover up. The IPA report found that up until 2028, Australia will have a net housing supply shortfall of 252,800 units, which is by any definition, a major housing crisis. The report shows that this crisis is a product of the government’s mass immigration program which will deliver a net of 1.755 million new migrants by 2028. And a major portion of this is international students on student visas, with around two-thirds of the 400,000 net new migrants arriving in the financial year ending 2023, being on student visas. It is openly admitted now that most of these students come solely to become residents, and the government now welcomes this, so the international student market, keeping the evil universities afloat, is just part of the immigration Great Replacement program, that began in the post-World War II period, and now accelerates.

I have been covering the great illusion of electric vehicles, including refuting the claim that they are somehow environmentally friendly. They are not, with the vast batteries alone requiring rare earth resources that are highly polluting in their mining, and difficult to put out when the cars decide to burst into flame. And, as noted at the great site for debunking nonsense, dangerous and harmful nonsense arising from the climate change agenda, Internationalman.com, if the average household adopted electric vehicles, this would add an electricity consumption equivalent to 25 refrigerators! Yet Biden intends to have 50 percent of all cars sold in America electric by 2030, and Australia and the UK are not too far behind. This is simply not possible given that electric vehicles in places like California, are problematic in energy use, and the grid is already getting close to collapse from present energy use.

The American press are jumping up and down about the report of Chinese nationals, all no doubt communist Chinese spies wandering into US military bases and other sensitive sites, collecting what information they want, then strolling out, happy, diverse and multicultural. What should be a concern to countries like the US and Australia, who are striving to replace their white populations by non-whites, in Australia by open Asianisation, is that communist Chinese spies and those loyal to mother China, are fast forming the ruling and technocratic classes of these societies. So, just imagine what happens if war with China occurs? Plugs from within will be pulled by the millions, and it all will come tumbling down.

That’s multiculturalism, white racial ethno-masochism and deracination for you:

Rita Cook, freelance writer, has explored the question of whether Direct Energy Weapons were used as part of a conspiratorial land grab in Maui, Hawaii. This has been mentioned at various Dissent Right sites such as Infowars.com, but as speculation; supposedly blue things did not burn, which is very odd indeed.  She says that it is odd that the area is sealed off now, with large walls constructed. It is something out of a zombie apocalypse movie. As well, there are reports of witnesses seeing lasers ignite grass lands, but this is hearsay, with the witnesses keeping their heads down.

One thing is clear, anything the UN is involved in turns bad, given its agenda for the creation of a one world government, and the lust for power. Thus, the UN cybercrime treaty should be a way of controlling cybercrime, such as digital criminal activities like ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, and the exploitation of children online,  if it was anything at all.

However, it has evolved into a battle between the US on the one hand, and Russia and communist China and Iran on the other. Russia, China and Iran want to extend the scope of the concept of cybercrime: “You could end up in a situation where a treaty intended to boost global cooperation on cybercrime becomes a means for authoritarian states to surveil their populations, access and share personal data of their citizens, and criminalize online content and behaviors they don’t like,” said Megan Roberts, interim managing director of the Digital Innovation and Democracy Initiative at the German Marshall Fund think tank.”

Students of cultural decline need to carefully study the case of Argentina. In the early part of the 20^th century, this was a booming country, that was heading to equal many countries in Europe in terms of standards of living. It certainly was economically and culturally far ahead of much of South America. Then the great, and disastrous experiments with socialism and its variants occurred throughout the world, and now we come to Argentina today, after these experiments.

 As described by a local, below the place has already undergone partial social collapse in many regions, with massive crime, inflation is above 100 percent, one of the highest in the world, and 40 percent of the population living in poverty. Home invasions are common, sometimes with gangs barricading entire buildings and looting and raping their way through. And, strict gun control, done by socialist governments, leaves ordinary people at the mercy of the gangs.

There have often been comparisons made between modern America’s decline and the fall of Rome, with Internationalman.com, giving an interesting take. The parallels are mass immigration of “barbarians’ (as the Romans called them) or more kind, people who are ethnically and culturally distinct, spiralling taxation, unsustainable welfare, imperial overshoot from military adventures, and general cultural decline.

What occurred in ancient Rome, was that cultural decadence was produced by too much abundance, as argued by Lewis Mumford in his book, The City in History (1961). It was a case of the great quote by author G. Michael Hopf, that “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” The quote, from a sums up a pervasive cyclical vision of history, and the West is a part of this, not immune from the same forces.