The BBC have recently published a piece where they quoted, unnamed and unsourced research, allegedly showing that from an examination of skeletons, Black women were more likely than Whites to have died from the medieval plague, all due to, wait for it, “structural racism”! The analysis apparently looked at bone and dental fragments. But, that would be inadequate to determine the race, of the samples, but determination of the sex could be done by forensic dentistry depending on the quality of the samples. And furthermore, there were very few Blacks in 14^th century Britain anyway, not enough, if any, for such a comparison, so the analysis does not get off the ground.

It may have been a trolling of the BBC, but organisations like this are so woke now that things like this just get through.

Many of us have said that the Covid plandemic mandates were a softening up process for what is to come, as the globalists push ever onwards to their one world government New World Order. Dr Robert Malone at his substack develops this case.

The United Nations and World Health Organization have become globalised administrative entities from powers given to them by sovereign states from regulations and multilateral agreements. And there is even more to come in this globalisation of public health, with the pandemic treaty to be finalised in May 2024, if not defeated. Not only with health, but in matters relating to world’s economy, migration, monetary and financial systems, digital IDs, environment, agriculture, wages, and climate change policies, we find the UN and associated organisations, aiming for centralised control, to produce what Dr Malone calls a globalised command economy.

A nice article had appeared a little while back at the American Thinker.com. addressing just one mainstream media publication promoting climate change alarmism. The article that is criticised was in The Hill, a pretty much Democrat sympathetic publication, that in the past has even taken climate change alarmist pieces from Australian authors. Glenn C. Altschuler, “Climate Deniers Are Entitled to Their Own Opinions but Not Their Own Facts,” has given a concise outline of what the contemporary climate change believer takes as their faith, and a refutation is then offered.

The claims made by the climate change faithful are extraordinary when given sober rational consideration. Such as, the year 2023 is likely the hottest year in 100,000 years. How is this known, when no-one was around with thermometers to measure temperatures then? And as noted below, even for contemporary times when thermometers were being used, the claim is just wrong. Still, it gets the attention for dramatic effect.

Coming right up fast, across the world, unless there is mass public pushback, are carbon passports for international travellers, and perhaps after that, carbon passports to even travel between states. Various climate change alarmist advocates have championed the idea that "personal carbon allowances" in the form of carbon passports would vastly reduce the number of international flights that people could make, thus reducing their carbon footprint from air travel.

While the privacy and social control aspects of such proposals have been given a lively internet discuss, the first issue of concern here is that such measures will severely impact upon the world tourism industry. Tourism now is heavily committed to people being able to make use of air plane travel; while sea is possible with luxury cruises, most people simply want to visit a country like say Australia, see the sights, then go home back to work. There is no time for long transport ventures. Thus, along with the winding down of agriculture, the closing of farms, as seen with the Netherlands, the carbon passport will virtually guarantee the end of tourism, creating even more unemployment. But, that is the plan.

It is not just me noticing it, that there is something fundamentally wrong with Beijing Albo’s China policy. As noted by Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge, to get a handshake to Xi, “Albanese ended two winning World Trade Organisation cases, one on barley and the other on wine … which would have formally established that China uses trade as a weapon,” Mr Shoebridge told Sky News contributor Steve Price. “He has reversed his position on Darwin port, leaving it in the hands of a Chinese operator. “The biggest price he’s paid so far just to get to Beijing is silence on China’s increasingly dangerous military encounters with our Australian military and everybody else in the world.”

A brief note to draw people’s attention to a case that has been made in the Federal Court of Australia by Dr. Julian Fidge, a general practitioner and practice principal for Docker Street and South Wangaratta Medical Clinics, and argued by his lawyers, Katie Ashby-Koppens and Julian Gillespie. The case is based upon the allegation that Pfizer and Moderna’ mRNA vaccines contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and DNA contamination. The case originally revolved around issues of genetically modified material, both companies' alleged failure to obtain the necessary GMO licenses and their lack of transparency with respect to the nature of the vaccine’s contents. But now the case has incorporated evidence from across the world that synthetic DNA contaminants are in the mRNA vaccines. The issues now relate to the possible impact of these contaminants upon the human genome, cancer and genetically based diseases. If the case is decided for Dr Fidge, it will rock the health establishment, and they deserve to be rocked and rolled!

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/legal-case-against-pfizer-and-moderna-for-dna-contamination-of-mrna-vaccines-8700bd69

The prediction has been made by geopolitical analyst Martin Armstrong, that with widespread global conflicts erupting across the world, with the Middle East being the latest, and intensifying each day, and with the open southern US border allowing terrorists to enter the US, which even the woke FBI predicts will lead to terrorist attacks across the US, martial law could be seen in the US. By implication, it is possible that martial law could be put into place in other Western countries including Australia, depending upon circumstances, such as if in the Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a nuclear bomb strike is made on the US military base of Pine Gap. The public panic will then be even greater than at the beginning of the Covid plandemic.

Regarding the US, I think Armstrong is spot on in saying that the Biden regime wants terrorist attacks upon the US so that under the guise of martial law, they will be able to pursue things in their agenda that are now more difficult to achieve, like the total banning of private firearms: ““You have Neocons pushing for war on all possible fronts. . . . Terrorism leads to lockdowns.  As soon as you start getting this, they will have to know what everybody is doing and where they are moving.  You are looking at ‘Papers, Please.’  . . . . Lockdowns are coming to America again, absolutely.  This is to prevent civil unrest.  So, they want the terrorists to blow up some stuff.  This gives them the excuse to effectively enforce martial law. . . . This helps the government to hold onto power.”

Leading China critic Gordon Chang has noted that Western countries with near open migration, non-discriminatory policies have, and still will, allow terrorists and saboteurs to enter their countries.  This was seen with the so-called refugee intakes into Europe from 2015, which led to terrorist attacks, and violent sexual assaults of white women, that still goes on relentlessly. But the present open US southern border is at yet another order of magnitude of a disaster.

The Biden administration, in its desire to beef up Democrat voters, but more keenly to produce the swift demographic replacement of the white population by non-whites, who they think may be more easily controlled in their socialist dictatorship, is allowing “strategic engineered migration” to occur by countries like Venezuela, who have been using migration as a weapon of attack against the United States.

We see the open contempt that the Davos elites have for we, the ordinary people, where at their talkfests they always have an anti-meat, let the people eat insects, grubs and bugs speech by some mousey academic type, while the tribe feasts on meat, and gets special services from prostitutes shipped in for the event.

This could be the beginnings of a disturbing development in the erosion of the rule of law in the West. We have seen in the US that the antifa Leftist rioters of 2020, were generally set free by Soros-funded District Attorneys, while the January 6 MAGA Trump protesters were treated harsher than any prisoners have been treated since the Civil War, with many being tortured in prison, and denied due process of the law. Yet beyond even the race issues, we now are seeing the rule of law being rode over in the name of climate change extremism.

After the No side won the Voice referendum there has been a push by the defeated Yes side to still press on with the agenda of a treaty and an extremely disturbing truth telling commission. There has been more discussion of the treaty than the truth telling commission, but both are clear threats to liberty and property.

The treaty will roll into place the disaster that has been seen in New Zealand, with a highly racialized politics, as well as some sort of reparations. How this loot will be divided from the money of the long-suffering tax payer, has not been detailed, let alone telling us who actually is an indigenous person to receive reparations. And the South African-style truth commission will simply be an institutionalised version of what is done at the universities to denigrate British settlement and the entire foundation of Australia. All paid for out of our taxes!

A recent paper in Science Advances throws a spanner in the climate change alarmist works, something we are keen to do at the blog, since this is the core agenda promoting the shutting down of farms (as in the Netherlands and Ireland) and the movement away from the secure energy source of fossil fuels. One of the planks of the climate change alarmist position has been that plants will cease to be what is called carbon sinks, absorbers of carbon, and become carbon emitters. Yet the research has shown now that plants will absorb 20 percent more carbon dioxide by the end of the century than previous predicted! This means that the climate change models being used by the UN and others like the World Economic Forum are off, since they have failed to account for a huge photosynthesis factor. And the conclusion to be made is that the UN models have over-estimated the extent of climate change.

Within the climate change alarmist paradigm, this is a huge blow. Of course, all the parties at the debate here accept the assumption that human-caused climate change is occurring, but the evidence that even from this paradigm that it is an exaggeration, is still useful to us critics seeking to save Western industry, jobs and out life style from a dark fate of returning to cold, barren caves.     

According to the mainstream climate change alarmist position, carbon dioxide increases since the industrial age, are causing untold dangerous events, such as the melting of the poles, especially Antarctica, which is mostly ice on a land mass, rather than free-floating ice, so that if the land-based ice melts, catastrophic sea level rises will occur. Or, so the story now drummed into every school child goes.

However, there is a major problem here. A paper just published in Science Advances, “Early Sea Ice Decline Off East Antarctica at the Last Glacial–Interglacial Climate Transition,” has shown that ice core and other geophysical data indicates that in the past a rise in carbon dioxide levels occurred a substantial time after, not before warming periods. Worse, for the mainstream climate change position, a vast amount of melting occurred in Antarctica from 21,000 to 19,500 years ago, which around 2,000 years before the local Antarctica climate started warming by up to 8°C. This in turn led to a rise of CO₂ of 80 parts per million (ppm). In other words, increases in carbon dioxide are effects, not causes of climate change.

Dr Peter McCullough has published a paper discussing the evidence related to autopsy findings in death after Covid vaccination. They examined every published autopsy report in a leading medical journal reference data base, and then independently adjudicated each death from the data. On this basis they concluded that 73.9 percent of deaths after vaccination are either direct due or significantly contributed to by mechanisms resulting from Covid vaccines.

While that is an important result in itself, what is also of interest, is that the paper was then labelled by so-called fact checkers as false news, even though the paper had been peer reviewed. This shows as Dr McCullough says, “that our paper is devastating to the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex pulling the strings of an army of fact checkers, social media bots, editors, and publishers. They are hell-bent on blocking or discrediting the truth on vaccine side effects in order to push the global lockstep “safe and effective” false narrative.”

After doing a great job on the Covid scamdemic, defending our basic liberties and civil and human rights, Senator Malcolm Roberts is going full power on attacking the climate change alarmist scam, with its cultist agendas such as wind power, or lack of power. He delivered a superb speech to the Senate, “Wind Scam Unravels as Projects Fail.” As he notes, wind projects across the West are failing. Ignoring the environmental costs, as the environmentalists tend to do, the economic costs are becoming crushing: “there are not enough mines to mine the materials, not enough steel mills to make the steel nor enough special-purpose ships to bring them across the world.”

It would be far more rational to devote all of this funding and finance to clean coal and making coal-fired power stations more carbon friendly. One could be forgiven for thinking that environmentalists are eagerly hoping for the collapse of Western civilisation, which would definitely fit in with the Leftist cultural critique of whiteness. Yes, destroy whiteness by bringing in a new Dark Age. The Left like colours.

It has been argued by many that climate change alarmism is a death cult. I have put this case at the blog myself. But Professor Zimmermann takes the critique to its logical conclusion, by asking, at least rhetorically, how long will it be before human sacrifices are made to the dark demon of climate change? After all, the Aztecs engaged in human sacrifice to honour their gods, and many cultures sacrifice children and virgin females, in an attempt to influence the weather. His point is that climate change alarmism has become a primitive religion, as illustrated by the environmentalist philosophy that is a version of sin and ecological repentance. And, they certainly believe that humans can control the weather, which is the key premises of climate change alarmism, that human activity is producing the eco-doomsday.

It is of course not necessary for modern environmentalists to go the full way as the ancient Aztecs did with actual physical human sacrifices. Instead, there are human sacrifices being made by the climate change agenda, involving the destruction of people’s lives by the policies of closing down farms and abandoning fossil fuels in favour of so-called renewable energy. And while actual people are not “sacrificed” yet, whales and bird life are dying from wind turbines, so here is a real death count. As depopulation is part of the climate change agenda, along with abortion on demand right up to birth in most cases, there is no doubt that more humans will die, or fail to be born, from climate change than from any other primitive practice.

https://www.rt.com/news/587544-climate-change-cult-human-sacrifice/

“History teaches us that some ancient civilisations killed their children to change the weather. They used to practice child sacrifice to appease their gods in an attempt to court their good graces. Those primitive peoples believed that through human sacrifice, the forces of nature could be coerced in their favour. For example, one of the ways the Aztecs honoured their gods was by killing people in a field with arrows so that their blood might fertilise the land.

Brian Simpson and myself have been covering the issue of cyber-attacks in Australia, which have increased by 23 percent from last year to number 94,000 reports in the 2022-2023. The most notable recent cyber-attack was the hack of Australia's second-largest port operator, DP World Australia, on November. 10.

The big news in the freedom movement at the moment is the victory of Javier Milei in becoming president of Argentina. Milei is like Donald Trump on steroids, highly manic and energetic. He did electoral promotions with a working chainsaw, indicting his plans to slash government spending. Milei is the first libertarian president the world has seen, and his program is to wind back government to the basic “night watchman” level, only doing basic things that free market fails to deliver in. He was featured in one advertisement, standing by a big white board and tearing off labels like “diversity and women” and tossing them away. In short, all the woke programs will get the chop if he has his way.

Igor Chudov has documented the chilling facts behind the World Economic Forum and UN proposal to reduce the number of births over the next 70 year from 130 million to 24 million per year. As he shows, the organisation Earth4All, a think tank that sprang from the Club of Rome, is also championing this agenda, one which the Club of Rome had.  Earth4All wants a reduction of childbirths by 81 percent by the year 2100 compared to the present level. They have a comprehensive agenda which involves first a massive transfer of resources from the West to the Third World, as increasing wealth levels will supposedly reduce the birth rate. And as well as part of this, the program requires replicating the strategy which has been done in the West of “empowering” women, so that they are working in the workforce and to busy to worry about having children.

This succeeded in the West, but I doubt it will do much in African nations like Nigeria, as the population momentum is now too great.

There is now a whole new class of “vaccines,” or more precisely gene therapy, called “Immunization DNA,” iDNA. The mRNA gene therapies, called vaccines, used against Covid, are based upon only the spike protein components. But now with iDNA, there is encoding for the entire virus. What this means is that now the cells produce the whole virus, not a part of it, but it is supposedly attenuated, rendered harmless. Or so Big Pharma says.

However, as Dr Mercola points out, all of these alleged safety proclamations were made with the mRNA vaxxes as well, but it is now known that the mRNA does not stay at the injection site and has affected millions with adverse effects. As Dr Mercola notes, if here could be these problems with a mere part of the virus being made by the human cells, then there is likely to be even more issues with the whole kitchen, or lab, sink.