Here is Professor Jordan Peterson’s take on why feminists love Islam and hate the West:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XGBpi6SvqE
The argument has been made previously by Matt Forney, and shock, horror, Andrew Anglin, that Islam for the feminists is a sh*t test for Western men. The radical Jihadist is the ultimate bad boy, who gets the girls “hot,” as the street talk goes. What does this say about such women, who get “hot” today, but punished for “zina” when the regime changes, tomorrow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zina.
I think that Peterson’s proposition is false, and extremely superficial. Some dopey women out on the street with signs may feel this, as would those old predator women, who in Europe are supporting young Muslim men with resources for sex, but Peterson’s explanation fails in generality. Male homosexuals and heterosexual Left also support radical jihadists, as well as any cause which is contrary to traditionalism. A good scientific explanation seeks to integrate a wide range of phenomena and provide a unified explanation for them.

