Britain has been Colonised by Immigrants (Sir Jim Ratcliffe), By John MacGhlionn

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has committed the modern British sin of saying out loud what many notice but few will admit. He looked at the numbers, the pressure on public services, rising welfare dependency, and rapid demographic change, and concluded that something is very wrong. Britain, he argues, has been "colonised by immigrants". The population has surged to about 70 million despite declining birth rates. Sir Jim is right. Only the wilfully blind would claim Britain today resembles the country of the early 2000s, let alone the Britain of the 80s and 90s.

Ratcliffe's warning echoes comments made years ago by John Cleese, who observed that London was "not really an English city anymore". The response was as pathetic as it was predictable. Dismiss the speaker, ignore the substance; insert an ad hominem in place of an argument.

But walk through parts of the capital today, and the sensation isn't one of cosmopolitan vibrancy. If anything, it's one of dislocation. Shop signs change languages every few meters. Entire neighborhoods feel detached from the civic rhythms that once defined the city. Diversity, we're assured, is enriching. But discontinuity breeds destabilization, and Britain is feeling its effects.

The controversy surrounding Ratcliffe's words rests on a deliberate conflation. Any criticism of immigration levels is recast as hostility toward immigrants themselves. That sleight of hand ends serious discussion. The issue is not whether newcomers contribute — some do, and do so admirably — but whether policy has prioritised scale over skill, speed over integration, and short-term labour fixes over long-term cohesion. When low-wage dependency expands while productivity stagnates, the social contract begins to fray. A welfare state built for balance can't absorb perpetual imbalance.

Britain's postwar immigration story contains success chapters worth celebrating. Doctors, engineers, entrepreneurs, and innovators have strengthened the nation. But the present debate concerns a different pattern: an influx weighted toward low-skilled labour entering an economy already struggling with housing shortages, stagnant wages, and overburdened public infrastructure. When supply outpaces absorption, pressure builds. Classrooms crowd. Surgeries overflow. Housing lists lengthen. The system strains, and strain breeds resentment.

As a chemical engineer-turned-industrial titan, Sir Jim understands how systems fail when inputs exceed their limits. You cannot add millions more variables to a closed vessel and expect stable pressure.

Dark humour may be the only way to cope with the absurdities. In parts of Britain, you can wait years for a council house, but a chicken tikka arrives before you've found the remote. The trains run late, potholes reproduce like rabbits, and the Home Office loses paperwork with the flair of a Vegas magician. Yet citizens are told all is well, while prices rise and fear of violent crime shadows ordinary life.

Ratcliffe is no sainted football saviour. His tenure at Manchester United has been turbulent, unpopular, and, at times, clumsy. Yet even critics concede he is an intelligent man willing to make unpopular decisions when he believes they are necessary. That trait, rare in an age of focus-group governance, is precisely what Britain lacks. Leadership now often resembles risk avoidance dressed as compassion. Difficult decisions are deferred. Problems compound. The bill arrives later, larger, and less negotiable.

To raise these concerns today is to risk social excommunication. The charge of "racist" is applied with mechanical speed. Yet a nation can't navigate rapid demographic change while forbidding debate about its consequences. Democracies rely on candour. When candour disappears, distrust fills the vacuum. If immigration rises alongside increases in serious crime, including rape, the public deserves an honest, evidence-based discussion rather than reflexive dismissal.

As I write this, I see that Sir Jim has apologised for any offence his words caused. That is a shame. There was no need to retreat. If anything, he didn't go far enough. A population jump of roughly 12 million in a few short years, driven largely by immigration, doesn't require a demographer to understand its implications. At the same time, fewer British-born families are having children, while many young, skilled people choose to leave. Numbers reshape nations. New cultures enter the mix, enriching in some ways and challenging in others. Although cultural change is inevitable, a stable society depends on integration and the firm application of common laws, especially in safeguarding women and prosecuting dangerous criminals.

If the share of people born and raised in Britain continues to shrink while outward migration rises, the country's character will inevitably shift. A society can evolve and endure, but it cannot transform beyond recognition and remain the same.

https://courage.media/2026/02/17/britain-has-been-colonised-by-immigrants/