President Trump has slapped sweeping tariffs on imports from just about everywhere — 25% on Canada and Mexico, 10% on China for drug trafficking, and more to tackle those massive trade deficits bleeding our manufacturing dry. These weren't just taxes; they were weapons in the war to bring jobs home, renegotiate lousy deals, and make foreign cheaters pay up. Billions poured in — over $200 billion by 2025 estimates — funding infrastructure, border security, and deals with powerhouses like the UK and Japan. It was classic Trump: Bold, disruptive, and effective.
But enter the Deep State judiciary. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court dropped a 6-3 hammer, ruling these tariffs illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Chief Justice Roberts, penning the majority, claimed IEEPA's "regulate... importation" doesn't cover tariffs because that's Congress's taxing turf. They hid behind the "major questions doctrine," demanding crystal-clear congressional okay for big economic moves. Joined by liberals Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson — and shockingly, pseudo-conservatives Gorsuch and Barrett — it felt like a stab in the back from supposed allies. This wasn't justice; it was judicial activism undermining a duly elected president's fight against globalist sellouts.
From a MAGA lens, this reeks of elitist interference. Trump's tariffs were emergency responses to real threats: Drug floods from cartels and unfair trade gutting American factories. The Court ignored history — like Nixon's 1971 tariffs under a similar law — and twisted the Constitution to clip the executive's wings. It's no coincidence this hits right as Trump's agenda ramps up. The swamp strikes back, but they forgot: Trump doesn't fold.
The Dissent: True Patriots Point the Way ForwardThank God for the dissenters — Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Alito — who called this nonsense out. They argued IEEPA's broad language absolutely allows tariffs as a tool to regulate imports in emergencies. Kavanaugh nailed it: "Regulate... importation" includes tariffs, just like quotas or embargoes — it's flexible for foreign threats, and courts should defer to the president here. Thomas blasted the majority's "major questions doctrine" as a made-up judicial power grab, ignoring Congress's right to delegate in foreign affairs. Alito joined in full force.
But here's the gold: The dissents didn't just gripe — they lit the path to victory. Kavanaugh explicitly flagged that Trump just "checked the wrong statutory box" with IEEPA. He spotlighted an arsenal of other laws ready to deploy: The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232) for national security tariffs, the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, 301) for unfair practices and trade deficits, and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338). Quote Kavanaugh: "Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232); the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, and 301); and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338). In essence, the Court today concludes that the President checked the wrong statutory box by relying on IEEPA rather than another statute to impose these tariffs." Boom — blueprint for bypass. These alternatives come with procedural hoops, but they're locked and loaded for America First policies. The decision won't "greatly restrict Presidential tariff authority going forward," as Kavanaugh warned, but it could spark short-term chaos like refunds (up to $175 billion). Still, the dissent screams: Pivot, adapt, and charge on!
How It's Avoided: Trump Flips the Script in HoursAnd charge on he did! Mere hours after the ruling, Trump didn't whine—he won. He torched the "fools and lap dogs" on the bench, then dropped a fresh 10% across-the-board tariff using — you guessed it — a 1970s trade law (likely Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974) targeting trade deficit nations. This isn't retreat; it's a reload. By sunset, the old IEEPA tariffs were wound down, but the new ones kick in Tuesday, keeping pressure on cheaters like China and Mexico. It's textbook MAGA resilience: When the establishment blocks one door, Trump kicks down another.
This dodge aligns perfectly with the dissents' roadmap. Those other statutes? They're tailored for exactly this — national security, unfair trade, deficits. Section 232, for instance, lets tariffs fly if imports threaten security. Section 301 hammers discriminatory practices. No more "wrong box" — Trump's team is laser-focused now, with built-in safeguards to withstand court scrutiny. Markets dipped initially, but true patriots see the long game: Stronger deals, more jobs, and billions in revenue without the legal headaches. Refunds? Let the importers squirm; Congress can step up if needed, but don't hold your breath from the do-nothing Dems.
Broader MAGA Implications: A Wake-Up Call to Drain the Judiciary SwampThis isn't just about tariffs, it's a battle cry. The Court's "conservative" majority showed its true colours, siding with globalists over American workers. Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett: et al. MAGA demands loyalty to the Constitution's original intent, not this watered-down deference to Congress. Trump's response proves why he's the GOAT: Defiant, quick, and always one step ahead. As deficits balloon (potentially $2 trillion more without tariffs), this pivot keeps the economic engine humming.
Looking ahead, expect Congress to rally — or get primaried. Push for explicit tariff delegations to bulletproof future moves. And globally? Allies tremble, adversaries rethink — Trump's trade wars just got smarter. The message: America First isn't optional; it's inevitable.
The SCOTUS ruling was a swamp sucker punch, but Trump's lightning pivot — guided by those dissenting heroes — turns it into a speed bump. We're avoiding the hit by swapping statutes, reloading with tools like Sections 232 and 301, and charging full steam ahead. The elites thought they'd hobble the movement; instead, they ignited it!
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-rejects-trumps-tariffs-in-landmark-decision-5942584