Alex Marlow's Breaking the Law argues that the Biden White House orchestrated a vast conspiracy to rig the 2024 election by weaponising the legal system against Donald Trump, aiming to jail or bankrupt him to block his presidency. This "lawfare," legal actions used as political tools, targeted Trump through six major cases, each with alleged ties to Biden's administration, Democratic power structures, and donors. This represents a profound abuse of power, threatening democracy itself. Below, we outline Marlow's case and propose how to address this systemic injustice to prevent future abuses.

The Case: Six Lawfare Attacks on Trump

Marlow details six legal cases, four criminal, two civil, designed to consume Trump's time, resources, and focus during the 2024 campaign, forcing him to campaign from courthouses. Each case, he claims, has direct or implied connections to the Biden White House, which could have stopped them but didn't, revealing a deliberate strategy to subvert democracy.

1.Stormy Daniels "Hush Money" Case: This Manhattan case, led by DA Alvin Bragg, wasn't about illegal hush money, but falsifying business records. Despite being the weakest case, it resulted in 34 felony convictions. Bragg, bankrolled by George Soros, campaigned on targeting Trump. The judge, Juan Merchan, a Biden donor, had a daughter raising millions for Democrats. Critically, lead prosecutor Matthew Colangelo left a senior DOJ role under Biden to join Bragg's team days after Biden's October 2024 comment, "We gotta lock him up," suggesting direct White House influence.

2.Fani Willis's RICO Case: Fulton County DA Fani Willis pursued a RICO case against Trump, alleging election interference. Her unqualified prosecutor, Nathan Wade, met with White House counsel for eight-hour sessions in 2022, and Willis met Vice President Kamala Harris in 2023, months before Trump's indictment. A former Biden aide, Jeff DeSantis, allegedly liaised between Willis's office and the White House, pointing to coordinated efforts. The case's flaws, including Wade's lack of RICO expertise, suggest political motives over legal merit.

3.Jack Smith's Special Counsel Investigations: Appointed by AG Merrick Garland, special counsel Jack Smith led two criminal probes into Trump's handling of classified documents and January 6. Smith, a known partisan with Obama-era ties, staffed his team with Biden and Obama donors. His appointment, ruled unconstitutional, coincided with Colangelo's DOJ exit and Wade's White House visits, implying Biden's involvement. Smith's release of documents during the election season further suggests election interference.

4.E. Jean Carroll's Defamation Case: This civil case, funded by Biden megadonor Reid Hoffman and orchestrated by anti-Trump lawyer George Conway, aimed to bankrupt Trump. Hoffman, a frequent White House visitor in 2022, backed Carroll's legal team, led by Roberta Kaplan. The case's New York setting ensured a biased judge and jury, costing Trump millions. Marlow sees this as a billionaire-backed attempt to sway the election.

5.Letitia James's Property Valuation Case: New York AG Letitia James, who campaigned on "suing Trump every day," accused him of inflating asset values in a victimless case. Judge Arthur Engoron, linked to Sen. Chuck Schumer via his clerk Allison Greenfield (who violated donation ethics), imposed a $450 million penalty to cripple Trump financially. James's multiple White House visits in 2022–2023 raise suspicions of coordination.

6.Additional Context: Marlow notes Biden could have halted these cases but didn't, as they served his electoral strategy. Trump's claim, "This is a Biden prosecution," is backed by Biden's October 2024 remark and the timing of key personnel moves, like Colangelo's DOJ-to-Bragg shift.

Addressing the Abuse: Accountability and Reform

Marlow warns that without accountability, lawfare will persist, eroding democracy. He proposes immediate investigations, and we expand on this with actionable steps to restore justice and prevent future abuses.

Congressional Investigations and Subpoenas:

Congress and the U.S. Office of Special Counsel must launch probes into the Biden White House, DOJ, DAs (Bragg, Willis, James), and donors (Soros, Hoffman). Subpoenas should target records of White House meetings (e.g., Wade's and James's visits), DOJ communications, and funding trails. Key figures like Jeff DeSantis and Matthew Colangelo must testify under oath. These investigations, as Marlow urges, are critical to map the conspiracy and expose coordination.

DOJ Reform: The DOJ's independence must be reinforced. Trump's allies, like Steve Bannon, suggest flooding the DOJ with loyalists to counter bias, but this risks further politicisation. Instead, codify post-Watergate norms barring White House interference in DOJ investigations, as Biden violated by commenting on Trump's cases. Enforce strict ethics rules for prosecutors like Colangelo, who moved from DOJ to Bragg's team, and limit special counsels' unchecked power, as seen with Smith's unconstitutional role.

Judicial Oversight: Judges like Merchan and Engoron, with clear conflicts (e.g., Merchan's donations, Greenfield's ethics violations), must face disciplinary action. State bar associations should investigate and penalise partisan judges and prosecutors. Federal legislation could mandate recusal in cases with financial or political ties, addressing Marlow's "greatest conflict of interest" in the Bragg case.

Campaign Finance Transparency: Donors like Soros and Hoffman, who allegedly fuelled lawfare, must face scrutiny. Expand disclosure requirements for political donations to legal campaigns, ensuring transparency in cases like Carroll's, backed by Hoffman's nonprofit. This curbs billionaires buying legal outcomes, a tactic we've criticized in institutional overreach.

Public Awareness and Electoral Accountability: Marlow notes voters rejected lawfare by electing Trump, but public education is key. Media must stop dismissing White House ties as "conspiracy theories" and report facts, like Wade's meetings or James's visits. Grassroots campaigns, amplified on platforms like X, can pressure lawmakers to act.

Legal Precedents and Protections: Strengthen laws against prosecutorial misconduct, including penalties for baseless cases like James's victimless suit. Reinstate protections against Schedule F, which Trump's allies propose to fire career DOJ lawyers, ensuring nonpartisan expertise. Courts must uphold rulings like the one dismantling Smith's role, setting precedents against lawfare.

A Broader Threat

Marlow's case reveals a pattern of institutional weaponisation. Lawfare, like coercive vaccine policies or urban decay, thrives when elites choose power over principle. Without reform, the DOJ and courts risk becoming tools of political vendettas, as seen in Biden's alleged strategy to "lock up" Trump.

By pursuing investigations, reforming the DOJ, and ensuring judicial and donor transparency, we can dismantle the lawfare playbook. This not only vindicates Trump but safeguards democracy from future abuses, challenging systemic rot across institutions.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/04/exclusive-breaking-the-law-expose-reveals-biden-white-house-orchestrated-lawfare-against-trump-to-rig-2024-election/